Coordinate factory closure work beside retained production
- Reading time
- 3 minutes
- Last reviewed
On this page
Bring the retained operation and closure project together before work affects their shared site. Each team may understand its own task while making different assumptions about access, services or who can authorise a change.
Ask the competent safety and project leads to establish the necessary arrangements. This article is an owner-level meeting agenda. It does not specify barriers, separation distances, permits or technical work methods.
Use the meeting to resolve the shared assumptions
Start with the actual planned activities and current area status. Ask the following interface questions:
- Which production activities continue, and what does their accepted operation require?
- What work does the closure project propose, within which assessed scope?
- Where can one activity affect the other, including people, services and access?
- Who coordinates those interfaces through the applicable arrangements?
- Which changes require further assessment or approval before proceeding?
- How are unexpected conditions reported and escalated?
- How will both teams identify the current accepted decision?
Record the owners of unresolved questions. Do not finish with a general agreement to "work around each other" when the necessary assessment remains open.
For work that is construction work in Great Britain, refer to HSE's commercial-client guidance and obtain appropriate advice about roles and arrangements. The applicability and required controls depend on the actual project.
Revisit the interface when either side changes
Suppose retained production needs an additional order completed while the closure contractor's planned activity has already been assessed against the earlier programme. The business must bring the new request into the responsible review route. Neither team should assume its own schedule automatically takes priority.
Ask the relevant leads to identify the consequences and the decision needed. Update the accepted programme and communicate the change to affected parties through the agreed process. Keep technical acceptance separate from the commercial desire to preserve both dates.
The staffing coverage review may reveal another interface: the same internal engineer is supporting retained production and answering contractor queries. Confirm the required competence and availability rather than double-booking the person on two plans.
Keep the decommissioning brief current when scope changes. A contractor's original proposal may no longer describe the work or assumptions being discussed.
When a disposal enquiry with UK Auction Group includes an area beside continuing production, explain the relevant boundaries and open decisions. Ask how the proposed commercial activity would be coordinated within the site's established arrangements. Do not offer access beyond what the responsible people have accepted.
Review whether all parties can find the current contacts and instructions. The owner needs evidence that the coordination arrangement is usable, while the competent teams retain responsibility for their actual work.
See the manufacturing site closure hub.
Sources
This guide is general information and education only. Legal, tax, employment and safety decisions may need a qualified adviser who knows your situation. Read the disclaimer.