Agree quality responsibilities when sites combine
- Reading time
- 3 minutes
- Last reviewed
On this page
When work moves into a retained operation, give its quality decisions a named owner. The receiving team needs to know which requirements apply, who can approve the result and where the evidence belongs. Moving the equipment does not answer those questions.
Begin with one real product or service route. Follow it from the accepted customer requirement through production, inspection and release. Ask the people responsible for the work to identify any approvals whose scope depends on the site, method, equipment or named organisation. Confirm the actual requirements with the relevant customer or specialist; do not assume an existing certificate covers a changed arrangement.
Make the handoff specific
A fictional handoff might contain the following unresolved points:
| Decision | Current position | Required owner action |
|---|---|---|
| Drawing revision | Sending site uses revision C; receiving folder contains B | Technical owner confirms the approved instruction |
| Inspection evidence | Results are stored against the sending site's job number | Quality owner agrees traceable access under the new reference |
| Release authority | Local supervisor previously signed the record | Responsible manager confirms who may release the transferred work |
| Exception handling | Teams use different concession forms | Quality owner checks the applicable approval route |
Do not resolve a disagreement by choosing whichever form looks newer. A document's appearance says little about whether it applies to the job. Preserve the question until the person with the relevant authority has answered it.
Separate shared inspection from quality responsibility
The business may centralise inspection while leaving some technical decisions with product specialists. That can work only if both sides understand the division. A completed measurement is not necessarily permission to accept a departure from the specification.
Set the service arrangement through the shared inspection guide. Then state who interprets an exception, who speaks to the customer and how production learns the decision. Avoid leaving a job on hold while each team assumes the other can release it.
If the move also changes the production method, check the customer acceptance questions before assuming previous approval remains sufficient. The answer depends on the actual agreement and process, not the fact that both sites belong to the same business.
Close the loop before the former site disappears
Try finding the records for a recent completed job using the receiving team's access. Can the responsible person identify the instruction, inspection result and release decision without calling someone at the old site? Record what failed and who will fix it.
Keep this exercise separate from choosing which inherited operating record is authoritative. Access makes information available; authority establishes which information people should act on.
Equipment that the approved future process no longer needs may become surplus. Discuss that scope with UK Auction Group once the operating and quality decisions are clear. Retain any equipment still needed for unresolved work or evidence until the responsible people decide its role.
Sources
This guide is general information and education only. Legal, tax, employment and safety decisions may need a qualified adviser who knows your situation. Read the disclaimer.