Should inspection become a shared service?
- Reading time
- 2 minutes
- Last reviewed
On this page
A shared inspection function may give the business access to experience that was previously spread between sites. It can also put more work into one queue. Define how the service would operate before removing the local arrangements it replaces.
Start with the actual product and customer requirements. The relevant quality and technical people must decide the appropriate inspection methods, equipment and authority. This article concerns the business handoff and service arrangement.
Describe what arrives at the shared function
Ask each department to identify routine work, urgent requests and exceptions that need a decision. Include the records accompanying the item. A queue can stall because the inspection team lacks a current specification, even when a person and suitable equipment are available.
Record who submits work, who confirms the request is complete and who receives the result. Decide where a question goes if the evidence does not support release. Do not assume centralising inspection transfers every commercial decision to the inspection team.
The quality-responsibility guide helps define those boundaries. The authoritative-record review addresses conflicting specifications or statuses inherited from different sites.
Agree a working service arrangement
Use the following questions in the planning meeting:
- Which work is included, and what remains with another specialist?
- What information must accompany a request?
- How will the business prioritise competing accepted commitments?
- What turnaround assumptions have evidence behind them?
- Who authorises a response to an exceptional or incomplete request?
- What happens when the usual contact is absent?
Write the answers in the terms the teams actually use. A service target should not become a customer promise until the appropriate people have agreed the implications.
Test a difficult handoff
In a fictional consolidation, one department sends a finished component with its local job reference. The shared inspection team cannot find the approved drawing revision. The component waits while the originating planner believes inspection is delaying an urgent delivery.
The proposed service needs a complete-request check and a named route to resolve the missing reference. More equipment alone would not fix that particular delay.
Use the combined-order priority guide to prevent local managers from bypassing the agreed queue. Track exceptions so the owner can see whether the service assumption fits the actual work.
The resulting arrangement may release duplicate inspection furniture or equipment, but the technical lead must first confirm what the retained service needs. Discuss approved surplus with UK Auction Group, preserving any restrictions on availability.
After the shared service begins, review both completed work and waiting requests. Ask why work waits, which information is missing and who resolves it. Give each recurring cause of delay an owner and a proposed correction.
Sources
This guide is general information and education only. Legal, tax, employment and safety decisions may need a qualified adviser who knows your situation. Read the disclaimer.