Check fixtures and gauges before declaring a process replaced
- Reading time
- 3 minutes
- Last reviewed
On this page
The new machine may be ready while a small fixture beside the old one still controls whether a particular product can be made. That fixture can be easy to overlook because it is absent from the capital purchase and far less conspicuous than the machinery.
Review production and inspection aids against products, not merely against the machine beside which they happen to sit. Location is evidence of use, but it does not establish ownership, future need or inclusion in a sale.
Follow one product through the aids it uses
Ask the production and quality teams to identify the aids needed for a representative job. These might include workholding, a checking fixture, a template or a dedicated gauge. Let the responsible technical people determine suitability for the proposed process; this exercise does not authorise modification or reuse.
Give each aid an existing reference where possible. Record which product uses it, which process currently needs it, who holds it and who can confirm its future role. Add ownership questions when a customer or supplier provided it.
A fictional example shows why the product view matters. Two products share a checking fixture even though they use different machines. One machine is retiring, but the second product continues. Listing everything in the retiring machine's area as surplus would conceal that dependency.
The product-range decision supplies the current scope. Include the rare variants, because their aids may live in a cupboard rather than the normal production area.
Make the decision visible to both teams
| Aid reference | Continuing work that needs it | Decision still required | Responsible contact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fixture F12, fictional | Two product families | Technical suitability for proposed route | Production lead |
| Gauge G07, fictional | Customer-controlled inspection | Customer and quality requirements | Quality contact |
| Template T04, fictional | No continuing work identified | Ownership and authorised destination | Business owner |
Do not use this table as a calibration record or an equipment safety assessment. It is a way to keep unresolved business dependencies visible until the people responsible have answered them.
For any item shared between processes, explain how the project will avoid conflicting assumptions about its availability. If the proposal requires additional equipment or a different inspection route, record that dependency before treating the old arrangement as finished.
Freeze the sale scope only after the checks
The person preparing a disposal list needs an explicit included or excluded decision. "Accessories to follow" can hide a future disagreement if production assumes an aid stays while someone else assumes it leaves.
Use the replacement surplus-scope record to carry changes into the authorised instruction. Keep an earlier version when a decision changes, so the reason remains visible.
When discussing the surplus with UK Auction Group, identify which associated items are available and which remain unresolved. Ask the relevant advisers about uncertain ownership. Do not offer a customer's fixture for sale merely because its original job has finished.
Sources
This guide is general information and education only. Legal, tax, employment and safety decisions may need a qualified adviser who knows your situation. Read the disclaimer.