Give different closure advisers a consistent set of facts
- Reading time
- 2 minutes
- Last reviewed
On this page
An accountant assessing one closure date and a solicitor assessing another may produce answers that seem incompatible. Before comparing advice, check whether both received the same facts.
Maintain a short dated account of the current proposal. It should identify the relevant businesses, activity, dates, asset intentions and material uncertainties. Specialist attachments can remain separate and appropriately controlled.
Give facts a source and a status
Label an intended date as intended, a contractual date by its supporting document and an estimate by its basis. Keep assumptions visible instead of allowing repeated use to turn them into facts.
Record when an adviser received the relevant version. You do not need to send every document to every professional. The aim is consistent relevant information, with privacy and confidentiality respected.
The entity reference sheet can supply stable identifiers. The closure scope states which activity is stopping and which may continue. Those two short records often prevent a large amount of explanation being repeated inconsistently.
Write changes as differences
When a material fact changes, identify the old position, the new position and the affected question. Send the update to the advisers whose work depends on it through the agreed route.
A fictional owner first tells the accountant that all equipment will be sold. Later, a relative asks to retain several items and the solicitor hears that proposal. The shared factual account should be updated so both advisers assess the same intended arrangement, while making clear that it has not yet been authorised.
Avoid sending a fresh pack with no explanation of what changed. A concise change note makes it easier to identify whether existing advice needs review.
Advice assumptions provide the connection between a changed fact and an earlier answer.
Keep advice ownership clear
The shared facts document should not blend several professionals' conclusions into a single unexplained approval. Record who answered each question, the scope of the answer and any remaining condition.
If advice appears to conflict, use the comparison questions before choosing the answer that best fits the preferred timetable. Different scopes may explain the difference; a real disagreement needs appropriate professional discussion.
Give UK Auction Group the same current operational facts relevant to disposal, including ownership uncertainty and equipment still in use. Do not forward confidential professional advice wholesale unless its sharing has been appropriately considered.
The working record should let a new adviser understand the current proposal without reconstructing it from months of messages. Keep earlier issued versions as required by the agreed records arrangements, so the history of a decision remains traceable.
Explore advisers and sale authority.
Sources
This guide is general information and education only. Legal, tax, employment and safety decisions may need a qualified adviser who knows your situation. Read the disclaimer.